Why traditional network protection approaches are no longer sufficient for critical systems
Ukrainian businesses operate amidst an unprecedented rise in cyber threats. According to CERT-UA, 2,530 cyber incidents were registered in 2023 [2]. Attacks are becoming more targeted, affecting government agencies, the defense sector, energy, and commercial organizations. Among the most common threats are malware propagation, phishing, and account compromise.
Traditional perimeter defense, which focuses on creating strong external barriers, proves insufficient when attackers penetrate the network. After a successful breach, attackers use lateral movement techniques to spread through the network from the initial entry point to their primary target. This allows them to gain access to critical data and systems, causing significant damage. Network segmentation is a key tool for preventing such threat propagation, limiting the “blast radius” in the event of a successful attack.
Critical business systems: What exactly needs protection?
Critical business systems are the heart of any enterprise, ensuring its continuous operation and safeguarding its most valuable assets. These include Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems, financial systems, Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems, Industrial Control Systems (ICS/SCADA), and other information and communication systems that process state information resources or restricted access information. Compromise of these systems can lead to catastrophic consequences: from financial losses and confidential data leaks to operational downtime and significant reputational damage. For example, the cyberattack on Kyivstar in December 2023 caused estimated damages of approximately 3.6 billion UAH [1]. Protecting these systems requires special attention to data availability, integrity, and confidentiality.
Regulatory requirements in Ukraine: NBU and SSSCIP as drivers for segmentation
In Ukraine, regulatory bodies are actively tightening cybersecurity requirements, making network segmentation not just desirable but mandatory for many enterprises. The National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) has developed requirements for the functioning of the cybersecurity system in the banking system (NBU Board Resolution No. 178 of August 12, 2022 [3]) and for non-bank financial institutions (NBU Board Resolution No. 179 of August 12, 2022 [4]). These documents define the basic principles of cybersecurity organization, information exchange principles, and requirements for cybersecurity measures for critical information infrastructure objects, as well as introducing a risk-oriented approach to information security and cybersecurity. Network segmentation helps financial institutions comply with these requirements by isolating critical systems and data.
The State Service of Special Communications and Information Protection of Ukraine (SSSCIP) is the main subject of the national cybersecurity system. It sets requirements for information protection, especially for critical information infrastructure objects (CIIO) and providers working with the public sector. According to the Law of Ukraine “On Information Protection in Information and Communication Systems” [5], state information resources or restricted access information must be processed in authorized security systems or by obtaining an information security compliance certificate. Network segmentation is a key measure for building such secure systems and obtaining compliance certificates for comprehensive information protection systems (CIPS).
Architectural approaches to corporate network segmentation
The choice of segmentation approach depends on the organization's size, security needs, and available resources. Let's consider the main architectural approaches:
- VLAN segmentation (Virtual Local Area Networks): This is a traditional approach that divides a network into logical segments using switches. VLANs are cost-effective and relatively simple to implement for basic network separation, for example, by department. However, they have limitations in precision and can be vulnerable in shared zones, making them less effective for protecting critical systems from lateral threat movement.
- Firewall zones: This approach involves using physical or virtual firewalls to create isolated security zones. The firewall controls and filters traffic between these zones according to predefined rules, providing protection against unauthorized access and malicious software. This provides better control than VLANs alone but may still not be granular enough to protect individual critical applications.
- Microsegmentation: This modern approach uses software-defined policies to create isolated segments at a granular level, for example, between individual virtual machines, containers, or workloads. Microsegmentation significantly reduces the attack surface, provides east-west traffic control (within the data center), and effectively prevents lateral threat movement. It allows for the application of highly specific security policies for individual applications and services, limiting interaction to the necessary minimum.
- Software-Defined Segmentation (SDN/SDP): Software-Defined Networks (SDN) separate the control plane from the data plane, allowing centralized management of network devices through software applications. This provides increased flexibility, scalability, and security. Software-Defined Perimeter (SDP) is one implementation of SDN that creates dynamic, individualized network segments for each connecting user or device, providing access only to necessary resources. Such an architecture is the basis for implementing microsegmentation and Zero Trust principles.
Comparison of network segmentation approaches
| Segmentation Approach | Implementation Complexity | Required Investment | Security Benefits | Suitability for Critical Systems | Scalability for Different Organization Sizes | ROI Assessment | Scenario Recommendations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VLAN Segmentation | Low-Medium | Low-Medium (existing equipment) | Basic network separation, broadcast traffic limitation | Limited (insufficient granularity) | Medium (management complexity increases with expansion) | Low direct ROI, but reduces risks of basic attacks. | For small businesses or basic departmental separation with limited budgets. |
| Firewall Zones | Medium | Medium (hardware/virtual firewalls) | Traffic control between zones, rule-based filtering | Medium (depends on zone granularity) | Medium-High | Medium ROI, improves protection between functional blocks. | For medium businesses or isolating large functional blocks where clear control between zones is needed. |
| Microsegmentation | High | High (specialized software, integration) | Significant reduction of attack surface, prevention of lateral movement, granular policies | High (ideal for protecting individual applications and workloads) | High (especially in cloud and virtualized environments) | High ROI due to significant reduction in risks and incident consequences. | For enterprises with high security requirements for critical systems operating in virtualized or cloud environments. |
| Software-Defined Segmentation (SDN/SDP) | High | High (SDN controllers, specialized software) | Centralized management, dynamic policies, flexibility, foundation for microsegmentation and Zero Trust | High (provides adaptive and comprehensive protection) | Very High (ideal for large and dynamic infrastructures) | Very high ROI, provides long-term flexibility and Zero Trust compliance. | For large enterprises and organizations with dynamic infrastructure aiming to implement a Zero Trust architecture. |
